Code Llama 70B vs Codestral: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Code Llama 70B and Codestral covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Code Llama 70B | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | mistral |
| Version | code-llama-70b | codestral |
| Release Date | 2024-01-29 | 2024-05-29 |
| Context Window | 16000 tokens | 32000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Llama 2 Community License | MNPL |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✓ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Code Llama 70B | Codestral | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 89.8 | 87.4 | Code Llama 70B |
| BBH | 72.1 | 58.3 | Code Llama 70B |
| GPQA | 25.3 | 32.4 | Codestral |
| GSM8K | 61 | 63.3 | Codestral |
| HUMANEVAL | 65.6 | 69.2 | Codestral |
| IFEVAL | 63.8 | 59.4 | Code Llama 70B |
| MATH | 34 | 29.4 | Code Llama 70B |
| MMLU | 62.1 | 75.1 | Codestral |
| MUSR | 40.1 | 47.2 | Codestral |
| WINOGRANDE | 75.5 | 75.8 | Codestral |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Code Llama 70B | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.9 | $0.3 |
| Output | $0.9 | $0.9 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Code Llama 70B vs Codestral
Model Overview
Code Llama 70B and Codestral are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Vendor | Release Date | Context Window | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta / Mistral | 2024-01-29 / 2024-05-29 | 16K / 32K | Llama 2 Community License / MNPL |
Benchmark Performance
| Benchmark | Code Llama 70B | Codestral | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 89.8 | 87.4 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 72.1 | 58.3 | A |
| GPQA | 25.3 | 32.4 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 61.0 | 63.3 | B |
| HumanEval | 65.6 | 69.2 | B |
| IFEval | 63.8 | 59.4 | A |
| MATH | 34.0 | 29.4 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 62.1 | 75.1 | B |
| MUSR | 40.1 | 47.2 | B |
| WinoGrande | 75.5 | 75.8 | Tie |
Pricing Comparison
| Input | Output | Cache Read | Cache Write |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
per million tokens — A / B
Strengths & Weaknesses
Code Llama 70B
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
- ⚠️ Context window 16K is limited.
Codestral
- ✅ Reliable general-purpose model.
- ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.
Editor’s Take
Code Llama 70B and Codestral each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
References
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.