Key Specifications

Specification GPT-4oGPT-4o mini
Vendoropenaiopenai
Version4o4o-mini
Release Date2024-05-132024-07-18
Context Window128000 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audiotext, image
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

Benchmark GPT-4oGPT-4o mini Winner
ARC93.9GPT-4o mini
BBH83.170.3GPT-4o
GPQA42.6GPT-4o mini
GSM8K95.875.1GPT-4o
HUMANEVAL90.278GPT-4o
IFEVAL67.9GPT-4o mini
MATH76.651.8GPT-4o
MMLU88.779.7GPT-4o
MUSR53.1GPT-4o mini
WINOGRANDE79.6GPT-4o mini

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok) GPT-4oGPT-4o mini
Input$2.5$0.15
Output$10$0.6
Cache Read$1.25$0
Cache Write$2.5$0

GPT-4o vs GPT-4o mini

Model Overview

GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Key Specifications

Vendor Release Date Context Window License
Openai / Openai 2024-05-13 / 2024-07-18 128K / 128K Proprietary / Proprietary

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark GPT-4o GPT-4o mini Winner
ARC 93.9 B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) 83.1 70.3 A
GPQA 42.6 B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) 95.8 75.1 A
HumanEval 90.2 78.0 A
IFEval 67.9 B
MATH 76.6 51.8 A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) 88.7 79.7 A
MUSR 53.1 B
WinoGrande 79.6 B

Pricing Comparison

Input Output Cache Read Cache Write
— / — — / — — / — — / —

per million tokens — A / B

Strengths & Weaknesses

GPT-4o

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ Input Modalities: text, image, audio.
  • ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.

GPT-4o mini

  • ✅ Input Modalities: text, image, audio.
  • ⚠️ Proprietary, not self-hostable.

Editor’s Take

GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

References

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.